Evaluasi Program Pendidikan Pada Anak Usia Dini Menggunakan Model CIPP
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53398/arraihanah.v6i2.1216Keywords:
Program Evaluation, CIPP Model, Early Childhood Education, Educational Evaluation, Literature ReviewAbstract
Program evaluation is an essential component of early childhood education (ECE) to ensure the achievement of learning objectives and improve the quality of educational services. One of the most widely used evaluation approaches is the Context, Input, Process, Product (CIPP) model because it provides a comprehensive framework for assessing program planning, implementation, and outcomes. This study aims to analyze the implementation of the CIPP model in evaluating early childhood education programs and to identify its benefits and challenges based on previous research findings. This study employed a qualitative approach using a literature review method. Data were collected from national and international journal articles, academic books, conference proceedings, and policy documents related to early childhood education program evaluation and the CIPP model. Data were analyzed using content analysis through data reduction, categorization, interpretation, and synthesis of previous research findings. The results indicate that the CIPP model is a systematic and comprehensive evaluation approach because it assesses program needs (context), resource readiness (input), implementation processes (process), and program outcomes (product). The application of the CIPP model enables early childhood education institutions to identify program strengths, weaknesses, and areas for continuous improvement, thereby enhancing the quality of educational services. Therefore, the CIPP model is considered an appropriate evaluation framework for supporting continuous quality improvement in early childhood education programsReferences
Alkin, M. C. (2013). Evaluation roots: A wider perspective of theorists' views and influences (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Arikunto, S., & Jabar, C. S. A. (2018). Evaluasi program pendidikan: Pedoman teoretis praktis bagi mahasiswa dan praktisi pendidikan (3rd ed.). Bumi Aksara.
Borg, W. R., & Gall, M. D. (2003). Educational research: An introduction (7th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Daryanto. (2013). Evaluasi pendidikan. Rineka Cipta.
Direktorat PAUD. (2021). Petunjuk teknis penyelenggaraan Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini. Direktorat PAUD, Kemendikbudristek.
Fitzpatrick, J. L., Sanders, J. R., & Worthen, B. R. (2011). Program evaluation: Alternative approaches and practical guidelines (4th ed.). Pearson.
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. SAGE Publications.
Hasan, H. (2009). Evaluasi kurikulum. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. (2011). The program evaluation standards: A guide for evaluators and evaluation users (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Kemendikbud. (2018). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 137 Tahun 2014 tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini. Kemendikbud.
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2018). Penguatan Pendidikan Karakter (PPK). Kemendikbud.
Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi. (2022). Capaian Pembelajaran Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini pada Kurikulum Merdeka. Kemendikbudristek.
Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi. (2022). Panduan pembelajaran dan asesmen Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini. Kemendikbudristek.
Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi. (2022). Kurikulum Merdeka untuk Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini. Kemendikbudristek.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.
Mertens, D. M., & Wilson, A. T. (2019). Program evaluation theory and practice: A comprehensive guide (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
Moleong, L. J. (2021). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif (Edisi revisi). Remaja Rosdakarya.
Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (7th ed.). Pearson.
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 137 Tahun 2014 tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini.
Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 146 Tahun 2014 tentang Kurikulum 2013 Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini.
Pianta, R. C. (2012). Handbook of early childhood education. Guilford Press.
Republik Indonesia. (2003). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2003 Nomor 78. Sekretariat Negara Republik Indonesia.
Rukiyati. (2019). Pendidikan karakter di sekolah: Implementasi budaya sekolah dalam membentuk karakter peserta didik. Jurnal Pendidikan Karakter, 9(2), 173–186. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpk.v9i2.25183
Stake, R. E. (1967). The countenance of educational evaluation. Teachers College Record, 68(7), 523–540.
Stufflebeam, D. L. (1971). The relevance of the CIPP evaluation model for educational accountability. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 5(1), 19–25.
Stufflebeam, D. L. (2003). The CIPP model for evaluation. In T. Kellaghan & D. L. Stufflebeam (Eds.), International handbook of educational evaluation (pp. 31–62). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Stufflebeam, D. L. (2007). CIPP evaluation model checklist (2nd ed.). Western Michigan University, Evaluation Center.
Stufflebeam, D. L., & Coryn, C. L. S. (2014). Evaluation theory, models, and applications (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Stufflebeam, D. L., & Shinkfield, A. J. (2007). Evaluation theory, models, and applications. Jossey-Bass.
Sugiyono. (2023). Metode penelitian kualitatif. Alfabeta.
Sukmadinata, N. S. (2017). Metode penelitian pendidikan. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Suryana, D. (2021). Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini: Teori dan praktik pembelajaran. Kencana.
Tyler, R. W. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. University of Chicago Press.
UNESCO. (2021). Right from the start: Build inclusive societies through inclusive early childhood education. UNESCO Publishing.
UNESCO. (2022). Global education monitoring report 2022: Non-state actors in education. UNESCO Publishing.
Worthen, B. R., Sanders, J. R., & Fitzpatrick, J. L. (2011). Program evaluation: Alternative approaches and practical guidelines (4th ed.). Pearson Education.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Zhang, G., Zeller, N., Griffith, R., Metcalf, D., Williams, J., Shea, C., & Misulis, K. (2011). Using the Context, Input, Process, and Product evaluation model (CIPP) as a comprehensive framework to guide the planning, implementation, and assessment of service-learning programs. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 15(4), 57–84.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ar-Raihanah: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Anak Usia Dini
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
.png)
